论文部分内容阅读
拉克劳和齐泽克是当代享有世界声誉的后马克思主义思想家。拉克劳和齐泽克都提出了一种解放话语,试图取代马克思主义的实践总体的辩证法。但二者对解放话语的理解却有着根本的差异。在拉克劳看来,代替马克思主义的实践辩证法的是霸权逻辑,而在齐泽克看来,替代马克思主义哲学的社会总体实践则是激进行动。本文通过对拉克劳的霸权辩证法和齐泽克的行动辩证法的阐释和解读,试图指明二者之间的相同与差异,并在此基础上,对后马克思主义的政治乌托邦进行批判。
Laclau and Zizek are post-Marxist thinkers enjoying world-wide reputation today. Both Laclau and Zizek proposed a dialectic of liberating discourse in an attempt to replace the general practice of Marxism. However, there is a fundamental difference between the two in understanding the liberation discourse. In Laclau’s view, the dialectic of hegemony instead of the Marxist practical dialectics appears to Zizek to take radical action in the overall social practice of substituting Marxist philosophy. This article attempts to point out the similarities and differences between Laclau’s dialectics of hegemony and Zizek’s dialectics of action, and on this basis, criticizes the post-Marxist political utopia.