论文部分内容阅读
关于基础研究在一个国家的研究开发政策中究竟应占什么地位以及它是否能带来实际经济利益的问题,近年来已成为国际科技政策界的一个辩论焦点。近期的《自然》与《新科学家》周刊,分别发表了香港大学的Eugene Wong、英国剑桥大学的Terence ealey的文章,从不同的观点和侧面对这一问题进行了探讨,提出了一些独到的见解,很富有启发性.另外美国《机械工程》杂志也发表了其专栏作者Pamela Beckel的一篇评述文章,提供了美国总统克林顿等人的一些重要政策观点。兹摘要报道如下:
The question of what exactly basic research should take for a country's research and development policy and whether it can bring real economic benefits has become a topic of debate in international science and technology policy circles in recent years. Recent “Nature” and “New Scientist” magazines have published articles by Eugene Wong of the University of Hong Kong and Terence ealey of the University of Cambridge, respectively, and discussed the issue from different perspectives and perspectives and put forward some unique insights And very inspiring.In addition, the United States, “Mechanical Engineering” magazine also published a column by its columnist Pamela Beckel's review article, provided some important policy perspectives of the U.S. President Clinton and others. The summary is reported as follows: