读贵刊93年第6、9期中杨建将、阮孟禹两位先生对《归乡行》(92年11期彩页)的见解,笔者认为,确有见地。复在第10期上又见宋念祖先生对《归乡行》的评价。觉得有些不妥。对此,也想谈点拙见,兼与宋先生商榷。《归乡行》从总体看,其立意布局合理,描绘出南国山乡的迷人风光,可见作者在水旱盆景创作上有一定功力。细观之,作为主景的一本三干式榆桩,在枝片处理上欠和谐,不尽完美。其中主干与右侧副干的枝片,从外观形状上看,疏密相间,自然灵动,有大树风貌,借鉴了岭南的造型手法。而左侧临水枝的枝片,则修剪成浓密规整的云片式,采用了规则式的一些造型手法,从 Read Your Publication 93, No. 6, 9 Yang Jian will, Nguyen Meng Yu two gentlemen on the “hometown line” (92 of 11 color pages), the author believes that indeed insightful. Complex again in the first 10 and see Mr. Song Nian Zu “hometown line” evaluation. Feel some wrong. In this regard, I would like to talk about my humble opinion, and discuss with Mr. Song. “Going to rural areas line” Overall, the rational layout of its rationality, depicting the charming scenery of the southern country, we can see the author has some skill in water and drought bonsai creation. Micro-view, as the main scene of a three-stemmed Yu-piles, the branches in dealing with the less harmonious, not perfect. Among them, the stems and the branches of the right and the main stems, from the appearance of the shape, are dense and white, natural and agile, with the style of a large tree, drawing on Lingnan modeling practices. The left side of the water branches branches, then trimmed into a thick cloud structured, using some of the rules of modeling techniques, from