论文部分内容阅读
在人文研究日益专业化、多元化的今天,很少有学术著作能像余英时的《朱熹的历史世界》(下称《朱熹》)一样,引起如此广泛热烈的讨论。总结起来,对于这本著作的评论大致有以下几类:第一,从理学研究范式转换的角度,肯定其成功地关注了理学家的社会关系和政治活动,实现了从“思想世界”到“历史世界”的理学研究范式转换,如陈来先生的文章~①。第二,从以哲学视角研究宋明理学的学者的立场,对余英时的研究方式有一定程度的保留。
Few academic works today, like the “Zhu Xi’s Historical World” (hereinafter referred to as “Zhu Xi”) under Yu Yingshi, arouse so extensive and heated discussions today that the humanistic studies are increasingly specialized and diversified. To summarize, the comments on this book generally fall into the following categories: First, from the perspective of the paradigm shift of Neo-Confucianism, I affirmed that it succeeded in paying attention to the social relations and political activities of Neo-Confucianism and realized the transformation from “Thinking World” To the “history of the world,” the paradigm shift in the study of science, such as Mr. Chen Lai’s article ~ ①. Second, from a philosophical perspective, the position of scholar of Neo-Confucianism has some reservations about Yu Yingshi’s research methods.