论文部分内容阅读
学术书评是学术研究不可或缺少的组成部分 ,也是学术对话和批评的重要形式。但长期以来 ,法学界一直存在轻视书评的倾向 ,甚至把书评排除在学术成果的大门之外。究其原因 ,在于法学界缺乏真正意义上的学术书评。我们见到太多为人捧场、商业广告式的书评 ,太多缺乏见地、言之无物的书评 ,于是以为书评不属于真正的学问。其实 ,研究性、批评性的学术书评 ,在理论价值上并不亚于一般的学术论著。严肃的、认真的学术书评 ,可能比一般的学术论著更有助于形成良性的学术规范和评价机制 ,提升学术对话和评论的水平。基于这一基本认识 ,本刊推出“学术书评”栏目 ,刊载那些富于批评精神、富有理论洞察力、富含真知灼见的学术书评 ,以期扭转学术书评的形象和声誉 ,为中国学术规范和传统的建立做出应有的贡献。
Academic book reviews are an indispensable part of academic research and an important form of academic dialogue and criticism. For a long time, however, there has always been a tendency for the legal profession to despise book reviews and even to exclude book reviews from the gate of academic achievement. The reason is that the legal profession lacks a real academic book review. We see too many people to join in, commercial advertising book reviews, too much lack of insight, nonsense book reviews, so that book reviews do not belong to the real knowledge. In fact, the research and criticism of academic book reviews, the theoretical value of no less than the general academic treatises. Serious and serious scholarly reviews may be more conducive to the formation of benign academic norms and evaluation mechanisms than academic scholarly writings, raising the level of academic dialogue and commentary. Based on this basic understanding, the publication of “Academic Book Review” column, published those rich in criticism, rich theoretical insight, rich in insightful academic book reviews, with a view to reverse the academic book reviews the image and reputation for China’s academic standards and traditions Establish and make its due contribution.