一、引言限制出境措施在诉讼程序中运用得比较广泛,针对的主体主要是诉讼参加人或者被执行人。但是,当法院根据一方当事人的申请限制另一方当事人出境后,被限制出境的当事人如果获得胜诉,一旦其向法院提起诉讼,要求申请人赔偿其因限制出境所导致的损失,法院是否应当支持其诉讼请求,这在实践中争议较大。这种争议很大程度上是限制出境制度本身的不完善所导致的。作为诉讼强制措施的一种,限制出境措施虽然在实践中运用得 First, the introduction of restrictions on exit measures used in the proceedings is more extensive, the main subject is litigation participants or executed persons. However, when the court restricts the other party’s exit from the country on the application of one party, if the party subject to restriction of exit wins a lawsuit, once the court files a lawsuit and requests the applicant to compensate for the loss caused by the restriction of exit, should the court support its Litigation request, which is controversial in practice. This dispute is largely caused by the imperfection of the exit system itself. As a kind of litigation coercive measure, although it is practically used in practice