论文部分内容阅读
福柯通过身体展开了刑法改革的谱系学研究,他向我们揭示了酷刑从未消失,只是从肉体转向了非肉体。鲍德里亚围绕当代社会问题的研究所形成的思想整体构成了对福柯及其权力话语理论的根本否定。本文通过比较鲍氏与福柯的权力观,发现鲍德里亚没有根本摆脱权力的二元对立思维,他的权力观既缺乏解构力量,也失之于建构性幻想。在此基础上进一步深化了对福柯权力思想的认识。在《规训与惩罚》这部著作中,福柯鲜明地揭示了权力与被客体化的或客体关系中的人性的关系,从而塑造出适于统治的人性,与此同时隐匿地探讨了“权力—知识”与主体性的或主体化人性的关系。这样一个含在整部著作中的一种新的人性思考值得研究与讨论。
Foucault conducted a pedigree study of the criminal law reform through his body, revealing to us that torture never disappeared but merely shifted from flesh to flesh. Baudrillard’s thoughts on contemporary social issues constitute the whole of the fundamental negation of Foucault and his discourse of power theory. By comparing the views of Powers and Foucault, Baudrillard finds out that Baudrillard does not fundamentally get rid of the dual contradictory thinking of power. His power outlook lacks both deconstruction and constructive fantasy. On this basis, we further deepen our understanding of Foucault’s power idea. In his book Discipline and Punishment, Foucault explicitly reveals the relationship between power and humanity in the object or object, so as to shape the humanity suitable for the rule, while at the same time, The Relationship between “Power - Knowledge” and Subjectivity or Subjectivity. Such a new human thought that is contained in the entire book deserves research and discussion.