论文部分内容阅读
目的对比两种助产方式,权衡利弊,优先选择更有效的助产方式。方法以我院过去四年内相应的出现过第二产程异常的孕妇为案例,比较说明产钳助产与剖宫产的不同优势。对两种方式进行有目的性的数据性质的统计分析,比较决策两种不同助产方式生产的孕妇在分娩期,以及产妇并发症与新生儿并发症的情况。结果经过比较分析,在胎儿娩出方面,产前助产组决策明显短于剖宫产组,且术中出血、切口伤口感染的状况均低于剖宫产组,且更不容易引起新生儿窒息,对新生儿的损伤小。结论产钳助产在生产过程起着极其重要的作用,极大降低了孕妇剖宫产的可能,更能保证母婴的安全,对其更有利,在产妇生产中的作用不可替代。
Objective To compare two methods of midwifery, weigh the pros and cons and give priority to choosing a more effective mode of midwifery. Methods In the past four years in our hospital, the corresponding occurrence of abnormalities in the second stage of labor as a case of pregnant women, compared forceps and caesarean section illustrate the different advantages. The purpose of the two methods were statistically statistical analysis of the nature of the data to compare the decision of two different midwifery methods of pregnant women in childbirth, as well as maternal complications and neonatal complications. Results After comparative analysis, the decision-making of prenatal midwifery group was significantly shorter than that of cesarean section in fetus delivery, and the intraoperative bleeding and incisional wound infection were lower than those of cesarean section, and less likely to cause neonatal asphyxia , Little damage to the newborn. Conclusion The forceps midwifery plays an extremely important role in the process of production, which greatly reduces the possibility of cesarean section in pregnant women, ensures the safety of mother and baby more, is more favorable to them and plays an irreplaceable role in the maternal production.