论文部分内容阅读
公共实施和私人实施是反垄断法的两种实施机制,而私人诉讼又是私人实施中的主要形式。很多国家或地区如美国、欧盟、德国、日本等都赋予私人主体的原告资格权利。相对而言,我国《反垄断法》仅在第50条原则性规定了私人可以起诉垄断者,但对私人诉讼原告资格的具体确定标准,却未予规定。我国有必要借鉴境外经验,以“影响标准”来确立反垄断私人诉讼的原告资格。
Public enforcement and private enforcement are two kinds of enforcement mechanisms of antitrust law, and private litigation is the main form of private enforcement. Many countries or regions such as the United States, the European Union, Germany, Japan and so on, give plaintiffs the rights of being private individuals. Relatively speaking, China’s “Anti-Monopoly Law” only stipulates in principle Article 50 that private individuals can sue monopolies, but the specific criteria for determining the qualifications of plaintiffs for private litigation are not prescribed. It is necessary for our country to learn from overseas experience and establish the qualification of plaintiff in antitrust private litigation by using “standard of influence”.