论文部分内容阅读
法律家长主义理论认为,政府在特定社会情境下可以为了公民的个人利益实现而限制其自由,即使是违背其意志。一方面,政府权威涉入个人自由领域的合理性需要被证明;另一方面,政府的干预要有限度,否则可能导致政府暴政。本文旨在讨论法律家长主义理论的合理性与限度,公民个体的有限理性、强弱有别及基于法律经济学的考量,都是家长式法律的存在理由,但法律家长主义的适用应以人性尊严保护、法的价值合理选择为限。
According to the theory of legal paternalism, the government can limit its freedom for the realization of the individual interests of the citizens in certain social situations, even against its will. On the one hand, the legitimacy of the involvement of government authorities in the field of personal freedom needs to be proven; on the other hand, government intervention must be limited, otherwise it may lead to government tyranny. The purpose of this article is to discuss the rationality and limits of legal patriarchal theory. The bounded rationality, strength and weakness of individual citizens and the considerations based on legal economics are the reasons for the existence of paternalistic law. However, the application of legal paternalism should be based on human nature Dignity protection, the law of the reasonable choice of the value of the limit.