论文部分内容阅读
法律适用一般意义上是司法三段论的推理形式,但是在疑难案件中,大前提和小前提都需要得到再次建构。解决疑难案件的关键是寻找到案件事实和法律文本之间的契合点。事实剪裁和文本解释作为两种解释路径需要得到司法裁判者的重视。法律适用中的解释学归根结底在于法官的事实剪裁和文本解释。这两种解释路径为司法活动参加者更精确适用法律提供了工具。
The application of law is generally the inference form of syllogism of judiciary, but in the difficult cases, both the major premise and the minor premise need to be reconstructed. The key to solving difficult cases is finding the meeting point between the facts of the case and the legal texts. Factual interpretation and textual interpretation as two kinds of explanation path need judicial attention. Hermeneutics in the application of law lies ultimately in the judge’s factual tailoring and textual interpretation. Both of these interpretation paths provide tools for participants in judicial activities to apply laws more accurately.