论文部分内容阅读
通过梳理刑法中潜藏的再次犯罪评价体系以及毒品再犯的价值属性可以发现,有关司法解释中的毒品再犯规定违反了再犯制度设立的初衷,违反了禁止重复评价原则,也干扰了既存的再次犯罪评价体系的逻辑平衡,更反映出司法解释对毒品再犯的功能性误读。毒品再犯的规定,只是为了填补“刑罚执行完毕5年之后”这一累犯制度留下的评价空白,而不能将其适用范围前置到判决宣告之时,为此需要对“被判过刑”进行重新解释,并且应当禁止“累犯加重”或者“再犯加重”的做法。
By combing the potential revocation system of criminal crimes and the value of drug recidivism in the criminal law, we can see that the provisions on drug recidivism in judicial interpretation violate the original intention of establishing the system of recidivism, violate the principle of repeated evaluation, and interfere with the existing criminal evaluation again The logical balance of the system also reflects the functional misunderstanding of drug recidivism by judicial interpretation. The provisions on drug recidivism are merely intended to fill in the blank of the appraisal left behind by the recidivism system “after the penalty has been executed for five years” and can not place its scope of application before the verdict is declared, for which reason “ Torture ”to be reinterpreted, and“ recidivism ”or“ recidivism ”should be prohibited.