言谏制度作为君主专制的纠错改正机制,在贞观之初较好地发挥了“正君”作用。可是,从“虚己纳下”到“渐不克终”,再到“不好直言”,李世民在纳谏问题上态度有了转化,这告诉我们言谏之艰难,常常受到各种限制、阻挠和干扰。为此,我们不应寄希望于君主对言谏的态度,而应完善“兼听”机制。 As a correction and correction mechanism of monarchy, imperative procuratorial system played a positive role at the beginning of Zhenguan. However, Li Shimin’s attitude toward accepting the remonstrance has been transformed from “living under the impenetrable circumstances” to “gradually ending up to no progress” and then to “not being honest and fair.” This tells us that the difficulties of making remarks and reminds are often subject to various restrictions, Obstruction and interference. For this reason, we should not pin our hopes on the attitude of the monarchs to remonstrance but should perfect the “concurrently listening” mechanism.