论文部分内容阅读
一、关于认识的起源与过程。康德认为认识始于经验，认识的过程实是主体凭先天认识力把客体自由地纳入自己的网络中，自由地赋与其特性和联系：皮亚杰则认为认识起因于主客体间的相互作用。活动既是感知的源泉又是思维发展的基础，人的认识通过同化和自我调节活动达到平衡态的不断发展。皮亚杰实际否定先天认识力的存在。二、关于认识的对象。康德把认识限于现象界，实质上，他指的认识对象不过是先天认识力，扩言之，即上帝的意志和伟力罢了。皮亚杰则坚持真理是个发展的范畴，客体是认识的极限，它是独立地、客观存在的、因果性等范畴都是客观的。三、结论：从一定意义讲，皮亚杰思想是对康德理论的唯物主义改造与补充。
First, on the origin and process of understanding. Kant believes that the process of cognition starting from experience and cognition is that the subject freely incorporates objects into his own network with his innate ability to freely recognize his characteristics and connections: Piaget believes that cognition arises from the interaction between subject and object. Activity is not only the source of perception but also the basis of thinking development. Human cognition achieves the equilibrium development through assimilation and self-regulation activities. Piaget actually deny the existence of innate awareness. Second, the object of understanding. Kant limited his understanding to the phenomenal world. In essence, what he refers to is merely an innate awareness and expansion, that is, the will and power of God. Piaget insists that truth is a category of development. The object is the limit of understanding. It is an independent and objective reality. Causality and other fields are objective. Third, the conclusion: In a certain sense, Piaget thought is the materialism transformation and supplement to Kant’s theory.