文有“虚”“实”古人论文,有“虚”“实”之说。袁宏道评论古诗文曾指出:古之为诗者,有泛寄之情,无直书之事,而其为文也,有直书之事,无泛寄之情,故诗虚而文实;晋、宋以后,为诗者有赠别,有叙事,为文者有辨说,有论叙,架空而言,不必有其事与其人,是诗之体已不虚,而文之体已不能实矣。(《雪涛阁集序》)笔者在本刊以前刊载的《说“四六”》一文里曾说过,唐前的所谓“散 Text has ”virtual “ ”real “ ancients papers, ”virtual “ ”real “ said. Yuan Hongdao commented on the ancient poetry once pointed out that the ancient poet, there is a general Sentiment, there is no direct book thing, and it is also a text, a straight book thing, no pan send, ; After the Jin and Song dynasties, there was a donation for the poet, a narrative, there are arguments for the writers, there is no argument, overhead, there is no need to have something with them, is the body of the poem is not empty, and the body of the text Can not be real. (”Xue Tao Ge set“) I previously published in the magazine, ”said “ four ”" a text once said, the so-called before the Tang Dynasty