论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨宫腹腔镜检查与子宫输卵管碘油造影的优缺点,及对不孕症病因的诊断价值。方法对102例在我院就诊的不孕妇女行宫腹腔镜检查与子宫输卵管碘油造影的结果进行分析。结果在诊断宫腔粘连、黏膜下子宫肌瘤、子宫内膜息肉两者差异有统计学意义。两者在诊断输卵管阻塞方面差异无统计学意义,在诊断盆腔粘连差异有统计学意义。结论 HSG简便、迅速、费用低,但有一定局限性;宫腹腔镜检查费用高,虽然是微创,但仍有一定的创伤,在诊断盆腔粘连时,宫腹腔镜检查明显优于HSG,并能进行治疗。在目前宫腹腔镜检查尚不能完全取代HSG,两者可以取长补短。
Objective To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopy and hysterosalpingography and the diagnostic value of infertility. Methods 102 cases of infertility women treated in our hospital palace laparoscopy and hysterosalpingography results were analyzed. Results in the diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions, submucosal uterine fibroids, endometrial polyps, the difference was statistically significant. The two in the diagnosis of tubal obstruction was no significant difference in the diagnosis of pelvic adhesions difference was statistically significant. Conclusions HSG is simple, rapid and low cost, but it has some limitations. Laparoscopy laparoscopy is costly. Although it is minimally invasive, it still has some trauma. Laparoscopy is superior to HSG in diagnosing pelvic adhesions. Can be treated. Laparoscopy in the current Palace can not completely replace HSG, both can complement each other.