Chinese History Societies in the First Half of the 20~(th) Century

来源 :Social Sciences in China | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:zhusimeng
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
民国时期,学人在致力于学术研究的同时,也多次尝试以学会组织的形式,联络同仁,沟通域外,以便分工合作,推进史学研究。在学校和区域性的组织之后,终于抗战期间组建了全国性的中国史学会,后来又成立了中国新史学会。不过,相比于其它学科,无论就组织的稳固性还是影响的大小而论,史学会都不免相形见绌。这反映了当时史学界的派分难以协调,以及各人对于学术团体的功能作用的看法分歧。 During the period of the Republic of China, scholars devoted themselves to academic research. At the same time, they tried many times to learn from the organization, contact colleagues and communicate with each other so as to facilitate the division of labor and advance the study of history. After the school and the regional organization, finally set up a nationwide Chinese history society during the War of Resistance Against Japan, and later established the New History Society of China. However, historiography can not be dwarfed by other disciplines, both in terms of the stability of the organization and the magnitude of its impact. This reflects the disagreement between the scholastic factions in the history of the time and the disagreements among the individuals about the functional role of the academic community.
其他文献
“在教师评价中,允许教师选择评价的资料,建立基于自己教学和专业发展的档案袋,强调教师对评价信息的自主选择”。[1]设计教师教学行为诊断式档案袋的最终目标,是方便学生全面了解教师,主动适应教师,从而更好地督促教师改进教学,提高教学监控能力,从而达到以学督教、以学评教、自主参评的目的,同时也为考评教师提供参考。基于多元智力理论视野下的教师档案袋,从开放的角度对教师工作进行诊断,强调反思在教师专业成长中