论文部分内容阅读
作为构式,“NP1+V给+NP2+NP3”表达一个给予事件,但进入该构式的“V给”在句法表现上存在着差异。文章论证了典型“V”的语义属性包括[+方向性][+终点性][+途径性]。在此基础上标注了不同动词小类的语义属性。得出结论:“V”和“给”的[+方向性]和[+终点性]是否相容制约着二者的并置与否。具体表现为:只要“V”与“给”[+方向性]不悖,二者即可并置。当“V”的[+终点性]是[+潜在的]或[-终点性]时,则“V”必须与“给”并置或共现才能表示“给予”。
As a construction, “NP1 + V gives + NP2 + NP3 ” expresses an event, but there is a difference in the syntactic performance of “V ” entering this structure. The article demonstrates that the semantic attributes of typical “V ” include [+ directionality] [+ end pointality] [+ wayality]. On this basis, the semantic attributes of different verb subcategories are marked. It concludes that the compatibility of [+ directionality] and [+ endings] of “V ” and “to ” restricts the co-existence between the two. Specific performance: as long as “V ” and “to ” [+ directionality] does not go against, the two can be juxtaposed. When [+ end] of “V ” is [+ potential] or [- end], then “V ” must be juxtaposed or co-exists with “to ”.