论文部分内容阅读
目的比较瘢痕子宫再次妊娠的分娩方法及疗效,寻求确保母婴安全的治疗方法用于临床推广。方法对我院妇产科2008年6月～2010年6月接产的138例瘢痕子宫再次妊娠的产妇的生产方式进行回顾性分析,并将剖宫分娩和阴道试产分娩的临床数据进行比较。结果 138例产妇中采用阴道分娩42例,占分娩总数的30.4%,其中40例试产成功,母子健康,成功率为95.2%。结论阴道分娩与剖宫分娩在瘢痕子宫再次妊娠的分娩中各有优势,应因人而异。
Objective To compare the delivery method and curative effect of scar pregnancy with uterine pregnancy again and seek to ensure the safety of maternal and infant treatment for clinical promotion. Methods A retrospective analysis of 138 pregnant women with uterine scar pregnancy from June 2008 to June 2010 in our hospital was carried out. The clinical data of cesarean section delivery and vaginal trial delivery were compared . Results Among 138 maternal women, 42 cases were vaginal delivery, accounting for 30.4% of the total number of delivery. Among them, 40 cases were successfully trial-produced and their maternal and child health was 95.2%. Conclusions Vaginal delivery and cesarean section delivery have their advantages in delivery of scar pregnancy again, and should vary from person to person.