论文部分内容阅读
For almost a month， China has been engaged in a heroic fi ght against the novel coronavirus. While the problem is principally in Hubei Province in central China with most cases， other provinces such as Guangdong in the south， Zhejiang in the east， and Henan in central China， have also been affected， though to a much smaller extent.
In other countries， hundreds of cases in total have been reported by then. These countries include Singapore， the Republic of Korea， Japan， Thailand， the U.S.， France and Germany. Although the novel coronavirus is not the same virus that caused the severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003， it has drawn some parallels in analysis because both epidemics broke out in the same country.
While China has been significantly transformed in these past 17 years， it is still encountering significant challenges as an emerging economy. This is evidenced in the 2009 Global Health Security Index， a project of the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security and the Nuclear Threat Initiative using research by the Economist Intelligence Unit. The index links relevant capabilities with the level of income and ranks China 51st out of 195 countries.
A public disease can start anywhere and makes no exemptions. Developed countries have also seriously suffered from them. The H1N1 influenza that appeared in 2009 was fi rst found in human beings in Mexico before reaching the U.S. that April. The U.S. had to declare a public health emergency， which was renewed in July and October of the same year.
As the incidence of illness continued to rise， President Barack Obama announced the influenza constituted a national emergency. Estimated fatalities in the U.S.， according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention， were 12，469. At that time， Beijing took successful measures to prevent the spread of H1N1. According to a China Youth Daily poll， the measures were highly appreciated by an overwhelming majority of Chinese society.
The Chinese Government’s battle against the current outbreak is multifaceted. There is intensive support being offered to patients daily， including psychological counseling. Two hospitals were built in Wuhan in only a few days， along with the implementation of numerous controls and taking people’s temperature in public places.
Additionally， efforts to test medicines and develop a vaccine are expanding. The speed， scale and efficiency of the response have been praised by WHO Director General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Moreover， the government is providing fi nancial assistance to citizens and companies suffering economic losses due to the disruption in their activities. This is the true meaning of a governmental social policy. When people are helpless due to an emergency beyond their means， the state needs to intervene.
As far as the international reaction is concerned， there are countries that are helping. Daily briefings at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs refer to specifi c cases along with the government’s appreciation of sup- port in these diffi cult times.
Japan has sent face masks， goggles， protective suits and other supplies for epidemic prevention and control. In his 2020 State of the Union address， Trump spoke about coordinated actions with China.
Despite the good intentions of some governments， the role of the international media in the coverage of the outbreak has been largely biased. The media are more interested in publishing stories that appeal to their readers and audiences than conducting a thorough investigation into the matter.
A few years ago， I wrote a book about the coverage of the Greek economic crisis in the international media and concluded that many journalists had unreservedly vilifi ed Greece and its citizens without having a clear idea about the problem or having visited the country. This is what is currently happening with China. You don’t have to be an expert in political communication to understand that the criticism of the Chinese Government comes from the Sinophobia in Western discourse.
Sadly， there have been incidents of racism and xenophobia against Chinese and people with Asian features. Fear and panic fueled by media reports lead individuals to occasionally demonstrate unacceptable attitudes.
But on a positive note， there are journalists across the world who condemn this behavior and warn about the impact of prejudice. People in Europe， where the racist incidents occurred， are more likely to be infected by seasonal influenza than the novel coronavirus. Countries that do not follow WHO guidelines and decide to suspend all fl ights to China will realize that it will damage their national economies.
This Spring Festival was certainly different. Numerous people had to stay at home and cancel their holiday or business plans for safety reasons. Despite the inconvenience due to the precautions and the uncertainty about the evolution of the public health emergency， Chinese society has remained united. This is perhaps China’s most important “profi t” in the last weeks. Even under extreme circumstances， the public is determined to fi ght together with biologists， doctors and authorities to tackle the problem. This mentality is rarely understood in the West， where critics of China and its governance model abound.
The Chinese leadership has not looked for excuses even though international criticism against it has been often unfair. Though the diagnosis of the virus was delayed and movement of people from Wuhan was not immediately controlled， the flaws have been noted and will shape future actions. The subsequent responsible mobilization by the Chinese Government is producing results. Thousands of patients have been released from hospitals， people are returning to their workplaces. Patience is still needed， but this element has never been absent in China.
When the epidemic is over and life returns to normal， it will not only ne China that will benefit， but the whole world. Solidarity with China will accelerate this global victory.
In other countries， hundreds of cases in total have been reported by then. These countries include Singapore， the Republic of Korea， Japan， Thailand， the U.S.， France and Germany. Although the novel coronavirus is not the same virus that caused the severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003， it has drawn some parallels in analysis because both epidemics broke out in the same country.
Effective measures
While China has been significantly transformed in these past 17 years， it is still encountering significant challenges as an emerging economy. This is evidenced in the 2009 Global Health Security Index， a project of the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security and the Nuclear Threat Initiative using research by the Economist Intelligence Unit. The index links relevant capabilities with the level of income and ranks China 51st out of 195 countries.
A public disease can start anywhere and makes no exemptions. Developed countries have also seriously suffered from them. The H1N1 influenza that appeared in 2009 was fi rst found in human beings in Mexico before reaching the U.S. that April. The U.S. had to declare a public health emergency， which was renewed in July and October of the same year.
As the incidence of illness continued to rise， President Barack Obama announced the influenza constituted a national emergency. Estimated fatalities in the U.S.， according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention， were 12，469. At that time， Beijing took successful measures to prevent the spread of H1N1. According to a China Youth Daily poll， the measures were highly appreciated by an overwhelming majority of Chinese society.
The Chinese Government’s battle against the current outbreak is multifaceted. There is intensive support being offered to patients daily， including psychological counseling. Two hospitals were built in Wuhan in only a few days， along with the implementation of numerous controls and taking people’s temperature in public places.
Additionally， efforts to test medicines and develop a vaccine are expanding. The speed， scale and efficiency of the response have been praised by WHO Director General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Moreover， the government is providing fi nancial assistance to citizens and companies suffering economic losses due to the disruption in their activities. This is the true meaning of a governmental social policy. When people are helpless due to an emergency beyond their means， the state needs to intervene.
International reactions
As far as the international reaction is concerned， there are countries that are helping. Daily briefings at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs refer to specifi c cases along with the government’s appreciation of sup- port in these diffi cult times.
Japan has sent face masks， goggles， protective suits and other supplies for epidemic prevention and control. In his 2020 State of the Union address， Trump spoke about coordinated actions with China.
Despite the good intentions of some governments， the role of the international media in the coverage of the outbreak has been largely biased. The media are more interested in publishing stories that appeal to their readers and audiences than conducting a thorough investigation into the matter.
A few years ago， I wrote a book about the coverage of the Greek economic crisis in the international media and concluded that many journalists had unreservedly vilifi ed Greece and its citizens without having a clear idea about the problem or having visited the country. This is what is currently happening with China. You don’t have to be an expert in political communication to understand that the criticism of the Chinese Government comes from the Sinophobia in Western discourse.
Sadly， there have been incidents of racism and xenophobia against Chinese and people with Asian features. Fear and panic fueled by media reports lead individuals to occasionally demonstrate unacceptable attitudes.
But on a positive note， there are journalists across the world who condemn this behavior and warn about the impact of prejudice. People in Europe， where the racist incidents occurred， are more likely to be infected by seasonal influenza than the novel coronavirus. Countries that do not follow WHO guidelines and decide to suspend all fl ights to China will realize that it will damage their national economies.
This Spring Festival was certainly different. Numerous people had to stay at home and cancel their holiday or business plans for safety reasons. Despite the inconvenience due to the precautions and the uncertainty about the evolution of the public health emergency， Chinese society has remained united. This is perhaps China’s most important “profi t” in the last weeks. Even under extreme circumstances， the public is determined to fi ght together with biologists， doctors and authorities to tackle the problem. This mentality is rarely understood in the West， where critics of China and its governance model abound.
The Chinese leadership has not looked for excuses even though international criticism against it has been often unfair. Though the diagnosis of the virus was delayed and movement of people from Wuhan was not immediately controlled， the flaws have been noted and will shape future actions. The subsequent responsible mobilization by the Chinese Government is producing results. Thousands of patients have been released from hospitals， people are returning to their workplaces. Patience is still needed， but this element has never been absent in China.
When the epidemic is over and life returns to normal， it will not only ne China that will benefit， but the whole world. Solidarity with China will accelerate this global victory.