论文部分内容阅读
世纪之交 ,“重读马克思”显然是一个令人激动却又并不轻松的话题。在经历了一个半世纪的历史沧桑之后 ,马克思的哲学仍然显示出无与伦比的思想穿透力 ,马克思主义在世界范围内仍然是最具活力的思想。在这种背景下 ,“重读马克思”就不是一厢情愿式的呼喊或细语 ,归根到底 ,这是深刻把握当代社会实践、探索解决时代问题、推进有中国特色社会主义事业的新发展和当代中国哲学的新发展的必然要求。为使“重读马克思”真正结出丰厚的果实 ,而不致流于单纯的口号 ,“重读”的方法论和价值承诺就是不容回避的。诸如 ,“回到马克思”的主题旨趣究竟何在 ,怎样“回”?如何把对经典文献的历史考证性解读与对社会生活这一最重要的“文本”的解读有机地结合起来 ?如何正确地理解马克思主义哲学的本质精神与当代价值 ,以及它与西方近、现代哲学的关系 ?如何把马克思主义哲学研究的“返本”与“开新”统一起来 ?2 1世纪马克思主义哲学的研究主题与发展前景如何 ?如此等等。中国社会科学院哲学所一群有志于马克思主义哲学研究的青年学人 ,以“重读马克思”为主题连续举行了数次学术座谈会 ,这里发表部分发言摘要 ,目的在于引起大家进一步的讨论兴趣。诚然 ,他们的所思未必深刻 ,所论未必精当 ,文笔亦稍嫌稚嫩 ,但其对?
At the turn of the century, “rereading Marx” is clearly an exciting but not trivial topic. After a century and a half of vicissitudes of history, Marx’s philosophy still shows an unparalleled penetration of ideas and Marxism remains the most dynamic thought in the world. In this context, “rereading Marxism” is not wishful thinking or rhetoric. In the final analysis, this is a profound insight into contemporary social practice, exploration and resolution of the problems of the times, new developments in the cause of promoting socialism with Chinese characteristics, and contemporary Chinese philosophy The inevitable new development requirements. In order to make Reinterpreted Marx truly bear fruit without losing its mere slogan, the methodology and value promise of Rereading can not be evaded. For example, what is the theme of “returning to Marxism” and how to “back”? How to organically combine the historical textual interpretation of the classic literature with the most important “text” of social life? Understand the Essence and Value of Marxist Philosophy, Its Relationship with Western Modern Philosophy and Modern Philosophy? How to Unify the “Return” and “Open Newness” of Marxist Philosophical Research? The Theme of Research on Marxist Philosophy in the 21st Century How are the prospects for development? A group of young scholars engaged in the study of Marxist philosophy in the Philosophy Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences held several academic symposia on the theme of “Re-reading Marxism.” Some of the speeches delivered here are intended to arouse people’s interest in further discussions. It is true that they may not be profound thinking, the argument may not be precise, writing is also somewhat immature, but right?