论文部分内容阅读
2151万元,这是湖南郴州商贩李清在销售假冒“鄂尔多斯”羊毛衫一案中被一审裁定的罚金数额。和这一天文数字形成巨大反差的是,李清供述,他在销售假冒“鄂尔多斯”羊毛衫中,仅获利1万元左右。事件曝光后,引发舆论普遍质疑和几乎一边倒的同情。然而,在天文数字背后,这一案件有着更为复杂的争议。目前,内蒙古高院已撤销一审判决,并发回重审。等待李清的,又将是何种判决?
21.51 million yuan, which is Chenzhou, Hunan trader Li Qing fake sales in the “Ordos” sweater case was convicted of the amount of the first instance. In sharp contrast with this astronomical figure, Li Qing confession, he sold fake “Ordos” sweater, only profit of about 10,000 yuan. After the incident was exposed, public opinion generally aroused doubts and almost one-sided sympathy. However, behind the astronomical figures, the case has a more complex dispute. At present, Inner Mongolia High Court has revoked the verdict of first instance, and sent back to retrial. Waiting for Li Qing, what will be the verdict?