“束”“缚”“捆”“绑”这一组同义动词在历时的演变过程中,都按照一般规律消长,但彼此的途径却不尽相同。“束”“缚”从先秦两汉一直竞争到宋元才告一段落,“捆”却呈现出一般词语所没有的异常现象:“捆”在六朝后到唐代的全部文献突然消失,被“缚”暂时代摄其职,宋元零星出现,明代又大量出现,重新司其原职。由于“缚”的双音节化不彻底,在“捆”出现后,最终完全退出这一意义领域。 The same group of verbs as “bundle,” “bundle,” “bundle,” and “tie” all grow and decline in accordance with the general laws during the diachronic evolution. However, the ways of each other are different. “Bundles” and “Bonds” had come to an end before the Qin and Han dynasties competed from the pre-Qin and Han Dynasties. However, the “bundles” presented the anomalies that ordinary words did not have: the entire literature of “bundles” suddenly disappeared from the post- On behalf of his duties, the sporadic appearance of the Song and Yuan Dynasties, a large number of Ming Dynasty and re-found its original position. Due to the incomplete syllabi of “bondage”, after the emergence of the “bundles”, it finally exited completely in the meaning field.