论文部分内容阅读
返还请求权让与由于其自身的法律构造难以表彰权利,不具有公示性,会对交易安全和第三人产生不利影响。因而需通过公示实现对交易安全和第三人利益的保护。不同的物权变动模式实现了对交易安全不同程度的保护。公示要件模式对交易安全的保护力度最大,但不利于简化交易程序。而公示对抗模式则实现了效率和安全的平衡,不公示并不影响当事人之间的物权变动效果,但不能对抗第三人。我国应采对抗要件模式中的德国立法模式。
Due to the legal structure of its own difficult to recognize the right to make the right, not publicity, will have a negative impact on transaction security and third parties. Therefore, it is necessary to realize the protection of transaction security and the third party’s interests through public announcement. Different modes of change of real right achieve different degrees of protection of transaction security. The publicity requirement model has the greatest protection of transaction security, but not conducive to simplifying the transaction process. The public display of confrontation mode is to achieve the balance of efficiency and safety, not public notice does not affect the effect of changes in property rights between the parties, but not against the third party. Our Country Should Take German Conflict Pattern Model in German Legislation.