论文部分内容阅读
在诉讼上,作为一种证明手段,在一定条件下,表见证明的运用始终发挥着独特而不可替代的功能。但是,在实务上,目前表见证明的应用遇到很大的困惑和障碍,究其原因,关键在于,理论上对于表见证明的研究缺乏明确的界定,或者说,虽然有界定,但是,在破解实务上的疑难问题时,涉及的相关概念、范畴与功能有待于进一步明晰。本文试图从表见证明的理论、实务等方面,对其基本属性、有关的争议焦点及应用功能进行论证并取得相应的结论。
In litigation, as a means of proof, under certain conditions, the use of forensic evidence has always played a unique and irreplaceable function. However, in practice, the current application of the apparent proof has encountered great confusion and obstacles. The reason lies in the fact that there is a lack of a clear definition of the proof of proof in theory or, in other words, Relevant concepts, categories and functions involved in resolving practical problems need to be further clarified. This thesis attempts to demonstrate its basic properties, relevant disputes and application functions from the theory and practice of the proof of appearance and draw the corresponding conclusions.