论文部分内容阅读
鉴于建筑工程领域拖欠工程款的通病,最高法院陆续出台了相关司法解释以保护施工人的合法权益,但在实践中,如何认定工程款逾期利息应付日或是否应付,各个法院判决不一。笔者结合办案实践,针对承包商给出相关建议。案件背景江苏南通XX建设集团有限公司(以下简称“A公司”)与上海B建筑装饰工程公司(以下简称“B公司”)签订了两份建筑工程分包合同,分别约定B公司将“永泰大厦”的室内外装饰、水电、安装项目和“南门大厦二期”工程分包给A公司施
In view of the common problems of construction payment in arrears, the Supreme People’s Court successively promulgated relevant judicial interpretations to protect the legitimate rights and interests of construction workers. However, in practice, how to determine whether the overdue interest payable in construction projects should be met or not, the judgments of different courts are different. The author combines the case practice, given the relevant recommendations for the contractor. Case Background Jiangsu Nantong XX Construction Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Company A”) and Shanghai B Building Decoration Engineering Company (hereinafter referred to as “Company B”) signed two construction subcontracts, respectively, B Company Will be “Wing Tai Building ” indoor and outdoor decoration, utilities, installation projects and “South Gate Building Phase II ” project subcontracted to A company facilities