论文部分内容阅读
在比较ACRL(2000)、ANZHIL(2004)、SCONUL(2011)以及北京地区高校信息素质能力指标体系(2006)的基础上,得出ACRL(2000)是比较全面的信息素质标准的结论结合SCONUL(2011)和北京地区高校信息素质能力指标体系(2006)中考虑到信息技术能力的思路,以ACRL(2000)和计算机自我效能为基础构建研究模型通过929份调查问卷的结构方程分析,表明:(1)ACRL(2000)作为信息素质评估标准是合通的;(2)计算机自我效能不属于信息素质能力范畴;(3)路径系数表明信息评估、信息需求以及信息道德对信息素质的景响占据主要的位置,信息存收与信息利川的影响占则相对不那么显著
Based on the comparison of ACRL (2000), ANZHIL (2004), SCONUL (2011) and Beijing University Information Literacy Indicator System (2006), it is concluded that ACRL (2000) is a more comprehensive information literacy standard. Combined with SCONUL ( 2011) and Beijing Information Literacy Index System (2006), the research model was built on the basis of ACRL (2000) and computer self-efficacy. The structural equation analysis of 929 questionnaires showed that: 1) ACRL (2000) is the standard of information literacy assessment; (2) Computer self-efficacy does not belong to the category of information literacy; (3) The path coefficient indicates the impact of information evaluation, information needs and information ethics on information literacy The main location, information storage and information Icheon impact is relatively less significant