论文部分内容阅读
法官解释法律的实质是赋予法律以生命,概念法学下的三段论的逻辑推理与自由法学及现实主义法下的利益衡量论,提供了两种处于极端的民法解释进路。然而在现实的司法实践中,不可能采取任何一种极端的做法。对民法解释方法的选择要根据本国的法治资源状况在两个极端之间进行表态。中国本土法治境况决定民法解释应当坚持以概念法学为主,利益衡量为补充。
Judges interpret the essence of law by giving the law the life, the logical reasoning of syllogism under the concept of law and the measurement of interest under the liberal law and the realism law provide two kinds of extreme civil law interpretation. However, in the actual judicial practice, it is impossible to adopt any extreme method. The choice of methods of civil law interpretation should be based on the state of law resources in the country between the two extremes. The situation of the rule of law in China decides civil law interpretation should adhere to the concept of law-based, to measure the interests of the supplement.