论文部分内容阅读
严肃的史学工作者虽然刻意寻找历史的真实,力求写出真实的历史,但是由于档案、认识、时代发展等种种因素的制约,对历史人物的评价往往只有最新的认识,而难有终极结论。“盖棺论定”固然是一种普遍的说法,实际上盖棺未必就能定论。客观地、历史地评价历史人物,不仅要以多元价值取向为必要的社会氛围;也要将微观的分析和宏观的思考辩证地结合起来,不能忽略大历史的视角。
Although the serious historians deliberately seek the truth of history and strive to write real history, due to the restriction of various factors such as archives, cognition and the development of the times, the evaluation of the historical figures is often only the latest understanding, and the ultimate conclusion is hard to come by. Although it is a common saying to say “what the hell”, in fact, it may not be possible to conclude it. Objectively and historically evaluating historical figures not only requires a multi-dimensional orientation as a necessary social atmosphere, but also a dialectical combination of micro-analysis and macro-thinking, and can not ignore the historical perspective.