论文部分内容阅读
马克思《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》在马克思主义哲学思想史上的历史地位问题一直没有定论。以英格.陶伯特为代表的一种观点认为,《提纲》仅仅是《神圣家族》的后奏,与随后的《德意志意识形态》没有关联。本文就学者陶伯特所持的这一种观点进行反思,通过对《神圣家族》和《提纲》的比较分析研究,笔者认为陶伯特关于《提纲》的写作时间,及其思想内容等方面做出的结论的理论依据值得推敲。
The issue of the historical status of Marx’s “Outline of Feuerbach” in the history of Marxist philosophical thought has been inconclusive. A view represented by Ingeau Tauber argues that the syllabus is only a posthumous play of the “sacred family” and has no connection with the subsequent “German ideology.” This article reflects on the viewpoint held by the scholar Taubert. Through the comparative analysis of the “Holy Family” and “Outline”, I think that Taubert’s writing time and content of the syllabus The theoretical basis of the conclusion is worth considering.