论文部分内容阅读
结合2008年至2015年间的法院民事判决和民事裁定并将其进行总结对比,可以发现人格混同的关联公司人格否认适用的法律依据在实务界依旧存在着较大的争议。类推适用《中华人民共和国公司法》(以下简称《公司法》)第20条第3款在法律适用和解释的原理上来看有不足之处,适用《中华人民共和国民法通则》(以下简称《民法通则》)第37条、《公司法》第3条第1款和第20条第1款规定是相对符合公司人格否认原理的合理选择,同时也应该注意诚实信用原则的限制适用。
Combined with the court civil judgments and civil rulings from 2008 to 2015 and their comparison, it can be found that the legal basis of the personality of affiliates with personality confusion denied the applicable legal basis is still a big controversy in practice. Paragraph 3 of Article 20 of the “Company Law of the People’s Republic of China” (hereinafter referred to as the “Company Law”) is analogous to the deficiencies in the principle of the application and application of law. The “General Principles of Civil Law of the People’s Republic of China” (hereinafter referred to as "Civil Law Article 37 of the General Regulations), Article 3 (1) and Article 20 (1) of the Corporations Act are reasonable choices that are relatively compatible with the principle of denial of company’s personality and should also pay attention to the application of the principle of good faith.