论文部分内容阅读
在知识产权领域,“外观设计”作为客体均可以受专利权、著作权保护。这导致实践中会出现同一个“外观设计”同时存在两个合法权利,进而导致外观设计权利冲突纠纷不断发生。从我国的专利法对于外观设计权利取得的程序的相关规定可以看出在当前的外观设计专利申请制度中,创造性并不是考虑的必要因素,外观设计的专利权并不能得到充分的保护,有时也使其因受限而致使创新制作困难。本文以重庆市法院审理的“美多食品公司著作权侵权纠纷”为视角,对外观设计专利权与著作权冲突的原因进行剖析,探寻处理冲突的措施。
In the field of intellectual property, “design ” as an object can be protected by patents, copyrights. This led to the practice of the same “design ” there are two legal rights, which led to conflicts of design rights continue to occur. From the patent law in our country, the relevant provisions of the procedure for the acquisition of design rights can be seen in the current design patent application system, creativity is not a necessary factor to consider, the design patent can not be fully protected, and sometimes To make it difficult because of the limitations of innovation and production. This paper analyzes the reasons for the conflict between the design patents and the copyright in the trial of the copyright infringement dispute of the “Mei Duo Food Company” in Chongqing court and explores the measures to deal with the conflicts.