Background:Refractory femoral neck fractures cannot be anatomically reduced by closed traction reduction which may affect fracture healing.We evaluated the biomechanical effects of positive,negative,and anatomic reduction of various degrees of displacement in Pauwels I femoral neck fractures by a finite element analysis.Methods:Five reduction models of Pauwels type Ⅰ femoral neck fracture were established using the Mimics 17.0 (Materialize,Leuven,Belgia) and Hypermesh 12.0 (Altair Engineering,Troy,MI,USA).According to the degree of fracture displacement,there were three models of positive support,an anatomic reduction model,and a negative 2 mm reduction model.Finite element analysis was conducted using the ABAQUS 6.9 software (Simulia,Suresnes,France).The von Mises stress distribution and the stress peak of intal fixation in different models,the displacement between fracture blocks,and the principal strain of the femoral neck cancellous bone model were recorded under the axial stress of 2100 N.Results:The peak von Mises stress on screw of each model was located at the thread of the screw tip.The peak yon Mises stress was the lowest at the tip of the anatomic reduction model screw (261.2 MPa).In the positive 4 mm model,the yon Mises stress peak was the highest (916.1 MPa).The anatomic reduction model showed the minimum displacement (0.388 mm) between fracture blocks.The maximum displacement was noted in the positive 4 mm model (0.838 mm).The displacement in the positive 3 mm model (0.721 mm) was smaller than that in the negative 2 mm model (0.786 mm).Among the five models,the strain area of the femoral neck cancellous bone was mainly concentrated around the screw hole,and the area around the screw hole could be easily cut.Conclusions:Compared with negative buttress for femoral neck fracture,positive buttress can provide better biomechanical stability.In Pauwel type Ⅰ fracture of femoral neck,the range of positive buttress should be controlled below 3 mm as far as possible.