论文部分内容阅读
合理使用的法律属性问题有着重大的实践意涵,我国法学界对此一直存在理解偏差。运用大陆法系主观权利和客观权利两分法以及霍菲尔德的权利理论,论证了合理使用是使用者的特权,是一种客观权利。法律规范的属性和正当化根据的不同都不会影响合理使用的特权或客观权利属性。如果著作权人利用合同或者技术措施妨碍使用者实现合理使用,使用者也无法获得法律的强制救济。
The issue of the legal attribute of fair use has a great practical significance, and there is always a misunderstanding in this field of law in our country. By using the dichotomy of subjective right and objective right of civil law system and the theory of rights of Hohfeld, it demonstrates that the fair use is the user’s privilege and is an objective right. The difference between the legal norms and the legitimacy bases does not affect the fair use or the objective rights. If the copyright owner to use the contract or technical measures to prevent the user to achieve reasonable use, users are also unable to obtain legal compulsory relief.