论文部分内容阅读
作为理想的制度目标,治安调解被认为是实现低成本社会控制的一种手段。然而在当前,治安调解出现异化,不仅难以实现社会控制的目标,进行调解的警察反而受到调解当事人的“控制”。经验调查显示,当事人可以通过调解来满足自己的利益诉求,而警察则倾向于进行无原则的妥协,追求“表面的和解”。治安调解的异化与当前的信访高压态势以及惧怕和回避矛盾冲突的“纠纷哲学”有关。在未来的警务改革中,需加强基层法治建设,恢复治安调解的应有之义。
As an ideal institutional goal, law and order mediation is considered as a means to achieve low-cost social control. However, at present, the alienation of law and order mediation is not only difficult to achieve the goal of social control, but the police who mediate instead are subject to “control” by the mediating parties. Empirical surveys show that parties can satisfy their interest demands through mediation, while the police tend to engage in unprincipled compromises in pursuit of “apparent reconciliation.” The alienation of law and order mediation is related to the current high pressure situation of petitions and letters and the “philosophy of struggle” between fear and avoidance of contradictions and conflicts. In the future police service reform, it is necessary to strengthen the building of the grass-roots law and order and restore the proper meaning of public order mediation.