论文部分内容阅读
法律实质推理既是司法主体的一种思维活动,又是一种司法行为。在制定法国家,长期的审判经验导致法官偏重于形式推理而忽略实质推理的重要性.为维护法律的权威,保障人民的合理预期,必须关注法律的正式渊源与非正式渊源、历史、社会习俗等在审判中的影响。在中国法制现代化的今天,欲推进司法改革,树立司法权威,法律推理是一个必要而且有效的媒介。
The legal substantive reasoning is not only a kind of thinking activity but also a kind of judicial act. In the process of formulating French countries, the long experience of trial led the judges to emphasize the formal reasoning while ignoring the importance of substantive reasoning.In order to maintain the authority of law and guarantee the reasonable expectations of the people, we must pay attention to the formal and informal sources of law, history and social customs Wait for the influence in the trial. Today in China’s legal modernization, to promote judicial reform and establish judicial authority, legal reasoning is a necessary and effective medium.