为解构“逻各斯中心论”德里达创造了diff啨rance(延异),制造了一个重大的“唯物”事件。这个词活跃在主体或先验意识结构之前,暴露了在逻各斯的说话结构之外吐露真相的“物质内容”,打开了一个空间的十字路口。“解构”作为一种“异”的哲学形态,既不同于东方思想强调“合”的传统,也不同于西方古典哲学的分析传统,所以是一种原创性的思想。所谓“解构”的异的空间,是在堵塞纵向或深度思维模式后的增补式活动空间,是各种活动要素之间横向的并置排列关系。在德里达的异域空间中,精神活动的统一性变化为精神活动的分裂性。德里达诉诸的“延异”,不同于黑格尔和马克思的“异化”或“扬弃”等辩证法概念。所谓德里达对马克思的“解构”,就在于德里达所理解的事物的出场和传播方式与黑格尔和马克思的理解有所不同,即无论“精神”还是“物质”,都可以以一种脱离了逻各斯中心论框架的方式“出场”。 For the deconstruction of the “logos center” Derrida created diff rance, creating a major “material” event. The word was active in front of the subject or the structure of transcendental consciousness, exposing the “material content” that revealed the truth outside the speaking structure of logos, opening up a spatial intersection. As a kind of “different” philosophical form, “deconstruction” is not only different from the tradition of “combining” oriental thought but also from the analytical tradition of western classical philosophy, so it is an original thought. The so-called “deconstruction” of the different space, is the block in the vertical or depth mode of thinking after the supplementary activity space, is a variety of activities between the elements of the horizontal juxtaposed relationship. In Derrida’s alien space, the unity of mental activity changes to the disintegration of mental activity. Derrida resorted to “difference” as distinguished from the dialectic concepts of “alienation” or “sublation” by Hegel and Marx. The so-called Derrida’s “deconstruction” of Marx lies in the fact that Derrida understands that the appearance and transmission of things are different from Hegel’s and Marx’s understanding that both “spirit” and “matter” Out of the logocentric framework of the way “appearance.”