论文部分内容阅读
以9种Web of Science农业经济与政策类期刊论文为例,从不同合著规模的合著绩效与不同被引水平的合著规模分布两个视角分析了合著规模与合著绩效的关系。研究结果显示,合著论文确实具有较高的研究绩效,2-3人的合著是该学科最常见的合作形式。在代表各期刊最高研究水平的极高引论文中,高合著规模论文极少,独著论文却占有一定比例,反映出合著规模与合著绩效的不确定性。在高合著规模的零被引论文中,发现了迟滞承认现象。最后,对合著行为的评价问题进行了讨论。
Taking 9 Web of Science agricultural economics and policy journals as an example, this paper analyzes the relationship between the co-operative scale and the co-operative performance from the perspectives of the co-operative performance of different co-operative scales and the co-operative scale distribution of different cited levels. The results show that the co-authored papers do indeed have high research performance, and the co-authoring of 2-3 people is the most common form of cooperation in the discipline. Among the highly cited papers that represent the highest level of research in each periodical, there are very few papers on highly co-authored essays but a certain percentage on monographs, reflecting the uncertainty of co-operating scale and co-operating performance. In a highly co-authored paper, the phenomenon of hysteresis was found. Finally, the issue of the evaluation of co-operation is discussed.