论文部分内容阅读
柳词问世后不久,就出现了批评的论著。今存文献中留下5位闽北学者对柳永及其词作的评论。这些评论或推崇褒奖,或贬斥无余,或毁誉参半,基本上体现了宋代文人对柳永的态度。古今比较,柳永故乡的当代学者对其研究却寥寥无几,究其原因:1、利用优势资源的自觉意识不强;2、柳永研究历史与现状错觉的困扰;3、对地方文化发展策略的关注滞后;4、学术氛围的淡薄与学术敏感的缺乏;5、学术研究与学科建设关系的疏离。展望前景,柳永研究空间尚大,远未穷尽。
Soon after the emergence of Liu Ci, a critical treatise appeared. Five documents from Northern Fujian scholars left a comment on Liu Yong and his Ci. These reviews or respected praise, or blameless, or mixed, basically reflects the attitude of the Song Dynasty scholar Liu Yong. Compared with ancient times and modern times, contemporary scholars of Liu Yong’s homeland have very few researches on it. The reasons are as follows: 1, Consciousness of using superior resources is not strong; 2, Liu Yong studies the misunderstanding of history and current situation; 3, Of the attention lag; 4, the academic atmosphere of the weak and the lack of academic sensitivity; 5, the academic research and discipline development alienation. Looking forward to the future, Liu Yong’s research space is still vast and far from exhausted.