论文部分内容阅读
谈起言论自由,似乎人人都有话说,而且对此或许能表达出一连串自己的意见和看法。诚然,言论自由是一个非常熟悉的词语,准确的来说,是一个非常基础的法律术语。简而言之,即人人都有自由说话的权利,这种权利它充斥着我们生活的点点滴滴。尽管如此,我们是不是真的能够深刻认识到言论自由的丰富的内涵以及它本质的属性?社会的进步,经济的发展,民主制度逐渐深入人心,我们越来越珍惜自己的权利,并且善于从各个渠道和途径来表达自己的看法,维护自己的权利和利益,特别是网络高科技的迅猛发展,借助着QQ、微信、微博、人人等交流平台,我们的联系越来越密不可分,我们的话语权得到了充分的尊重,平等、正义、公平的实现也离不开这些公共平台的推动。然而,问题也接踵而至,言论自由与隐私权、名誉权的冲突也进入我们的视野,并且越发火热。另一方面,众所周知,言论自由的典型的代表就是新闻自由,媒体在我们实际生活中的确扮演着一个不可或缺的角色,发挥着不可替代的作用,但是新闻自由是否意味着没有边界,新闻自由的限制是不是在某种程度上反映了言论自由的不彻底性?还是说这种限制本来就应该存在。如果存在,那么这种有限范围内的言论自由是否侵犯了人民的根本权利?随着“反腐”运动的盛行,我们看着一个个“老虎”的落马,我们是否又看到了高官腐败落马背后言论自由作为推波助澜的巨大推动力?在“打老虎”的过程中,我们又怎样将言论自由与反腐倡廉有效结合起来?随着本文的逐渐展开,我们会对言论自由有更进一步的认识。
When it comes to freedom of speech, it seems that everyone has something to say, and perhaps a series of his own opinions and opinions on that. It is true that freedom of speech is a very familiar word, and to be precise, it is a very basic legal term. In short, everyone has the right to speak freely, a right which is filled with bits and pieces of our lives. Nevertheless, can we really understand profoundly the rich connotation of the freedom of speech and its essential attributes? The progress of the society, the development of the economy, and the gradual deepening of the democratic system are among the people. We cherish our rights more and more, All channels and ways to express their views and safeguard their own rights and interests, especially the rapid development of high-tech network, with the QQ, WeChat, Weibo, everyone and other communication platform, our contact is more and more inseparable, Our right to speak has been fully respected, and the realization of equality, justice and fairness can not be separated from the promotion of these public platforms. However, the problems followed one after another. The conflicts between freedom of speech and privacy and reputation rights have also come into our field of vision and are getting hotter and hotter. On the other hand, as we all know, the typical representative of freedom of speech is freedom of the press. The media does play an indispensable role in our real life and plays an irreplaceable role. But whether freedom of the press means no boundaries and freedom of the press Did the restrictions reflect to some extent the incompleteness of freedom of expression? Or is it that such restrictions should have existed? If so, will such a limited scope of freedom of expression infringe the fundamental rights of the people? With the prevalence of the “anti-corruption” movement, we have watched the fall of “tigers” one by one and have we seen the senior officials again In the process of “playing the tiger ”, how can we effectively combine the freedom of speech with the anti-corruption? With the gradual commencement of this article, we will have freedom of speech. Further understanding.