论文部分内容阅读
本文依据自我概念的心理学意义,对国内亨利.米勒研究中性话语意义解释的“自我说”予以反思并做出另类理解。就作品整体而言,作者性自由张扬的是基于原欲的本能品质,主要依靠虚拟的方式进行满足,而且性话语的倾诉伤害了两性关系的自然情感。所以,笔者认为,作家小说中通过性方式对自我的确认和建构没有实现,也不可能实现。
Based on the psychological meaning of self-concept, this paper reflects on the “self-talk” of the domestic interpretation of neutral discourse by Henry Miller and makes an alternative understanding. As far as works are concerned, the author’s sexuality is based on the original instinctual qualities of the original desire, which is mainly fulfilled by the virtual way. Moreover, the discourse of the sexual discourse harms the natural emotion of the relationship between the sexes. Therefore, I believe that the writer’s novels through the sexual self-recognition and construction did not materialize, it is impossible to achieve.