论文部分内容阅读
2012年中国《刑事诉讼法修正案》对证据制度进行了修正,较修改前的内容有进步之处,也存在若干不足。例如,立法中虽然认同反对强迫自证其罪,但却并不认同沉默权,而且保留了行为人的供述义务;对“威胁”、“引诱”和“欺骗”这些非法取供行为发出宽容的信号;对非法搜查、扣押的取证行为缺乏坚决遏制的立法态度;对保证证人出庭作证来说,虽然规定了人身安全保障、经济补偿和司法处分措施,却没有规定这一制度最为重要的传闻证据规则,等等。
In 2012, the amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law of China amended the evidence system. There were some improvements and some deficiencies in the content of the amendment before the amendment. For example, while the legislation recognizes objection to forced self-incrimination, it does not agree with the right to silence and retains the perpetrator’s confession obligations. He also criticizes the unlawfulness of “threats”, “seduction” and “deception” Take a behavioral and lenient signal for the conduct of acts of illegal search and seizure of the evidence collection behavior of the lack of resolutely curb the legislative attitude; to ensure the witness to testify in court, although the provision of personal security, economic compensation and judicial measures, but does not provide for this The most important hearsay rule of the system, and so on.