论文部分内容阅读
由于不同政治、经济制度的实行,决定了同一文化背景下存在两种不同的专利保护制度。而专利法律制度的不同,直接导致两岸间专利侵权纠纷数量激增,严重影响经贸往来,因此有必要研究两岸专利侵权判定的异同。对两岸发明、实用新型(新型)要件及侵权判定原则比较,指出大陆应借鉴吸收台湾地区的有效规定,立足实际情况,加强自身立法建设。
Due to the implementation of different political and economic systems, two different kinds of patent protection systems exist under the same cultural background. However, the differences in the legal system of patent directly lead to the surge in the number of patent infringement disputes between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits, seriously affecting the economic and trade exchanges. Therefore, it is necessary to study the similarities and differences in the determination of patent infringement across the Taiwan Strait. Comparing the inventions, utility models (new types) requirements and the principle of determining infringement on the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, it points out that the mainland should learn from and absorb the effective provisions in Taiwan and strengthen its own legislative construction based on the actual situation.