论文部分内容阅读
人说比喻往往是跛足的,而有时联想更是无端的。听说戴煌的《胡耀邦与平反冤假错案》一书终于得以由港事顾问全国政协常委徐四民先生主持的镜报文化企业公司出版,不知怎么我心里忽然冒出“白头宫女在,闲坐说玄宗”的诗句。戴煌非宫女,耀邦亦非玄宗。不过有一点相似:宫女虽是说往事,但仍属当代,顶多也就是说的20年前事罢了。 20年,不算长,如果中经大变动,也会有隔世之感。犹忆1977年2月7日《人民日报》社论提出“两个凡是”的公式,意味着凡是毛泽
People say that the analogy is often lame, but sometimes the association is more groundless. I heard that Dai Huang’s book “Hu Yaobang and the Case of Reversal of Justice and Falsehood” was finally published by Mirror Culture Enterprise Co., chaired by Mr. Xu Simin, a member of the Standing Committee of the CPPCC, a Hong Kong-based consultant. I do not know how my heart suddenly appeared Xuanzong “verse. Daihuang non-palace ladies, Yaobang nor Xuanzong. However, one thing is similar: Although the palace ladies said the past, but still contemporary, at most, that is to say nothing of 20 years ago. 20 years, not long, if the major changes in China, there will be a second world feeling. Still remember February 7, 1977 ”People’s Daily“ editorial ”two common" formula, which means that any Mao Ze