论文部分内容阅读
根据后格赖斯版本的真值条件语义学,语义是非充分确定的,需用推理或某些方法中的缺省形式的语用加工结果补充之。此框架仍然可解释Carston(2002)提出的概念转换的情况,此概念转换体现为概念范围缩小或概念范围扩大。然而,这两个基本的跨范畴的情况中词汇编码的概念如何移向临时概念的问题仍待解决。Carston认为,抽象概念利用了已有的抽象图式,然而,虽然可以在话语中明说的内容的层面上分析这样的“非字面”义,但这样的概念构建未必需要有意识的推理,因为概念图式可自动引发意图表达的非字面义,具有认知语义学之潜意识意象图式之特征。在Carston的语用学充实的语义学中,对言语意义的真值条件式的语用充实的分析可以与认知图式角度的解释相容。不过,如果被编码的意义并不与被传达的意义紧密联系,那么话语的命题表征就不应过于依赖于句子的语法形式。在缺省语义学的理论中提出了语义表征独立于意义信息的特定源头(包括词汇和句法),此理论在这些不同信息源所使用的表征类型问题上持灵活态度。可以认为,既然认知语法的语义表征可被视为人类认知的表征,那么,真值条件语义学和认知语义学是相容的。
According to the post-Grice version of truth conditional semantics, the semantics are not sufficiently well-defined and need to be supplemented by reasoning or the default form of pragmatic processing in some methods. This framework can still explain the case of Concept Transformation proposed by Carston (2002), which is characterized by a reduction in concept or an expansion in concept. However, the question of how the concept of lexical coding in the two basic cross-sectional contexts moved to the provisional concept remains to be resolved. Carston argues that abstract concepts make use of existing abstractions. However, while such “non-literal” righteousness can be analyzed at the level of what is said in the discourse, such conceptual construction does not necessarily require conscious reasoning because Conceptual schema can automatically trigger the non-literal meaning of intent, with the subconscious image schema of cognitive semantics. In Carston’s rich semantics of pragmatics, the pragmatic enrichment analysis of the truth-valued conditional conditions of speech meaning can be compatible with the interpretation of cognitive schemata. However, if the meaning of being coded is not closely linked to the meaning conveyed, the propositional representation of discourse should not be overly dependent on the grammatical form of the sentence. In the theory of default semantics, a particular source of semantic representation independent of meaning information (including vocabulary and syntax) is proposed, which is flexible about the type of representation used by these different information sources. It can be assumed that since semantic representation of cognitive grammar can be considered as a representation of human cognition, truth conditional semantics and cognitive semantics are compatible.