论文部分内容阅读
重庆黑老大龚刚模的辩护律师李庄因诱导、唆使委托人编造证言、引诱证人作伪证而被提起公诉;律师张某隐瞒当事人造假擅自上诉而被法院训诫,而委托人拖欠诉讼费的情况更是时有耳闻。在人们享受律师提供的专业法律服务的同时,确实出现了一些不够和谐的声音,这也直接反应在了法院审理的案件上,诉讼代理合同纠纷案件正作为一种新的案件类型出现。律师不仅是案件的代理人,而且直接作为案件的当事人参加到诉讼之中。实践中,诉讼代理合同纠纷主要有以下几种情况:镜像一:律所谎称能够影响裁判结果委托人质疑合同效力2006年2月20日,原告某律师事务所与被告F公司签订一份委托代理协议,约定由某律师事务所作为F公司在一起案件中执行阶段的委托代理人,代理权限为:
Li Gang, an advocate of Gong Gangmo, a black boss in Chongqing, was prosecuted and instigated the client to fabricate a testimony and lured witnesses into perjury. He was prosecuted by lawyer Zhang for concealing the party’s false appeal without permission. However, When heard. While people enjoy the professional legal services provided by lawyers, some unrealistic voices do indeed appear. This directly reflects on the court proceedings. Cases of litigation contract disputes are emerging as a new type of cases. Lawyers are not only agents of the case, but also participate directly in the proceedings as parties to the case. In practice, litigation contract disputes are mainly the following situations: Mirror one: the law lied to affect the results of the referee The client questioned the validity of the contract February 20, 2006, the plaintiff a law firm and the defendant F company signed a commission Agent agreement, agreed by a law firm as an F company in the implementation phase of the commission agent, the proxy authority: