论文部分内容阅读
前见决定着理解的结果,有正确与错误之分。是否出现在法律规定中是法律责任与政治责任的根本区别,以及不能通过立法推动道德的发展,这是人们在理解引咎辞职时普遍怀有的两个前见。它们都是偏颇的,严重地干扰了人们的理解。同时,前见对认识的本体论意义决定了这两个偏见的影响不局限于引咎辞职认识和实践中,当前引起激烈争论的深圳改革立法就是另一个个案。
The result of understanding before the decision, there is a correct and wrong points. Whether it appears in the legal provisions is the fundamental difference between legal responsibility and political responsibility, and the inability to promote the development of morality through legislation is the two preconceptions commonly understood by people in understanding their resignations. They are biased and seriously disrupt people’s understanding. At the same time, the ontological significance of prejudice to understanding determines that the influence of these two prejudices is not confined to understanding and practice of resigning from blame. The Shenzhen reform legislation currently aroused heated arguments is another case.