论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨抗高血压药物氯沙坦的降压成效。方法选择2011年6月-2013年12月医院收治的80例高血压患者为研究对象,随机平均分成试验组与对照组各40例。对照组患者给予氨氯地平片治疗,试验组患者给予氯沙坦治疗,比较2组患者的抗压效果和成效比。结果试验组患者使用氯沙坦治疗的总有效率为92.5%,成效比为482.16;对照组患者使用氨氯地平的总有效率77.5%,成效比为567.74,试验组患者的总有效率和成效比均优于对照组,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论氯沙坦治疗高血压较氨氯地平降压效果好,临床治疗有效率高,临床疗效显著,而且,氯沙坦的成效比显著低于氨氯地平,患者治疗的成本低,经济、有效,易于在患者中推广使用。
Objective To investigate the antihypertensive effect of losartan. Methods Eighty hypertensive patients admitted from June 2011 to December 2013 in our hospital were randomly divided into experimental group and control group with 40 cases each. Patients in the control group were treated with amlodipine, losartan was given to the patients in the test group, and the compression and effectiveness were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of losartan in trial group was 92.5%, and the effective ratio was 482.16. The total effective rate of amlodipine in control group was 77.5%, and the effective ratio was 567.74. The total effective rate and effect of experimental group (P <0.05). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Losartan treatment of hypertension than amlodipine antihypertensive effect is good, clinical treatment of high efficiency, clinical curative effect is remarkable, and losartan effective rate was significantly lower than amlodipine, patients with low cost, economical and effective , Easy to promote the use of patients.