论文部分内容阅读
1999年陈某驾车交通肇事致程某重伤,在保护了现场,并将程某送往医院救治无效死亡后逃逸;2001年陈某自动投案并取保候审,此后,未经批准又擅自长期外出未归,直至2012年在通缉后被抓获归案。对此案有两种不同观点,一种观点认为:陈某的行为不属于交通肇事后逃逸。另一种观点认为:陈某的行为构成交通肇事后逃逸。这直接影响到对陈某的定罪量刑。对此,笔者认为,陈某的行为已构成交通肇事后逃逸。
Chen traffic accident in 1999 caused a serious injury, in the protection of the scene, and will be sent to the hospital after the death of a doctor died of escape; 2001 Chen surrendered and bail pending trial, since then, without authorization and unauthorized long-term out without permission Return until 2012, after being wanted in the arrest was brought to justice. There are two different views on the case, one view is that: Chen’s behavior does not belong to the traffic accident after the escape. Another point of view: Chen’s behavior constitutes a traffic accident after the escape. This directly affects the conviction sentencing Chen. In this regard, I believe that Chen’s behavior has constituted escape after traffic accident.