论文部分内容阅读
在国家法和民间法的关系问题上,我们预设存在一个二元式的对立,由此来展开对国家法和民间法效力的讨论。但是,如果这个预设根本不能成立,那么关于效力的讨论则无法进行。文章通过对A市制造业的产业工人工时状况的调查,描述了在工时制度上可能存在一套不同于国家强制性规定的行规,并展开了二者在内容上的冲突。然后从理论上对这个冲突予以阐释,并说明这并非真正意义上的国家法和民间法的冲突。而在特定的行规形成过程中,并非是某种民间之力量促成了行规的形成,对于公权力行使的规范在逻辑上的不完整可能是行规形成的关键。
On the question of the relationship between state law and civil law, we presuppose the existence of a dualistic opposition to the discussion of the validity of state and civil law. However, if this presupposition does not hold at all, discussion of validity can not be done. Through the investigation of working hours of industrial workers in the manufacturing industry in A City, this article describes the possible existence of a set of regulations different from the mandatory state regulations in the working time system and starts the conflict between the two. Then we theoretically explain this conflict and show that it is not a real conflict of state law and civil law. However, during the formation of a specific regulation, it is not the power of some kind of folk that contributed to the formation of a regulation. The logic incompleteness of the regulation of the exercise of public power may be the key to the formation of the regulation.